Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Taisei Construction Corporation et al
Atain Specialty Insurance Company |
Taisei Construction Corporation and Rick Slater Construction, Inc. |
3:2012cv01259 |
March 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Charles R. Breyer |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER DISMISSING CASE (45 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/26/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013) |
Filing 41 ORDER Further Case Management Conference reset for 4/19/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/5/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013) |
Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 24 Motion for Leave to File. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012) |
Filing 29 ORDER of withdrawl and substitution of counsel re 28 Notice of Change In Counsel filed by Taisei Construction Corporation, Attorney Joseph Jonathan Minioza terminated. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/7/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012) |
Filing 7 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/19/12. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.