Zamora et al v. City of Oakland et al
Olga Zamora and Jose Zamora |
City of Oakland, Anthony Batts, City of San Francisco and George Gascon |
3:2012cv02734 |
May 29, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Nathanael M. Cousins |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT 40 AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/26/13. ***Civil Case Terminated. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013) |
Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE FIRST AND SECOND CAUSES OF ACTION. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 8/12/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013) |
Filing 38 ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN OPPOSIITON TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 8/2/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013) |
Filing 36 ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 7/23/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this case should not be remanded to state court. Defendants shall file response by 6/15/2012. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/1/12. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.