Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. et al v. Beiswenger
| Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc. |
| John L. Beiswenger |
| 3:2012cv02754 |
| May 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT (cc: form mailed to register). (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to John L. Beiswenger. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons and Disclosure Statement; by Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A., Ubisoft, Inc. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012) |
Filing 2
ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 8/29/2012. Case Management Conference set for 9/5/2012 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 5/30/12. (Attachments: # 1 NC Standing Order)(aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF; against John L. Beiswenger ( Filing fee $ 350.00, receipt number 34611074617.). Filed byUbisoft, Inc., Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2012) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
