AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. v. Geosyntec Consultants Inc. et al
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. |
Geosyntec Consultants Inc., Anton Arulanantham, Robert Cheung, Brian McNamara, Joseph Niland, Syed Rehan and Bruce Travers |
3:2012cv02973 |
June 8, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Thelton E. Henderson |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/24/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2013) |
Filing 50 ORDER re 45 46 discovery disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/26/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER to File First Amended Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/05/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2013) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 23 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 1/24/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013) |
Filing 10 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/21/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.