Bauldry v. Town of Danville et al
| Lane Bauldry |
| Town of Danville, County of Contra Costa, City of Piedmont, Mona Daggett, Christopher Butler, Stephen Tanabe, Tom Henderson and Andy Wells |
| 4:2012cv03943 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
221
ORDER granting 220 request to excuse Thomas Henderson from appearing at settlement conference. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 22, 2015. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2015)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 198 Motion for Reconsideration and granting partial summary judgment. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER granting 199 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to continue opposition and reply deadlines filed by Lane Bauldry. Reset Deadlines as to 198 Amended MOTION for Reconsideration re 197 Joint MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's Denial of Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's 4th Amendment Claims, Related Conspiracy Claims, and State Wrongful Arrest Claim Pursuant to FRCP. Responses due by 7/9/2015. Replies due by 7/16/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/7/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER GRANTING re 186 Letter filed by Tom Henderson, County of Contra Costa. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/23/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 180 Administrative Motion to Set a Special Status Conference. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
178
REFERRAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/3/2015. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 127 Stipulation. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2014)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER re 115 Amended Document filed by Lane Bauldry. Reset Deadlines as. Dispositive Motions due by 11/1/2014. Motion Hearing set for 12/12/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer, Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/10/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
105
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 Order on Stipulation. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/2/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Dismiss. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT HEARING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/26/2013. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 53 Stipulation. THEREFORE, the Stipulating Parties request that the Court extend the deadline for Daggett to respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint from February 8, 2013 to, and including, February 22, 2013. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting request to extend time to file First Amended Complaint to 12/5/12. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/30/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 15 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
19
JUDGE ILLSTON'S STANDING ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
