Santiago v. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC
| Robert Santiago |
| Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC |
| 4:2012cv04462 |
| August 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING 31 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 24, 2013. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Responses due by 1/18/2013. Replies due by 1/25/2013.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/14/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING 26 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING 12 MOTION to Remand; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 12/28/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/4/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/19/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 11/13/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
