Fuller v. Bigley
Plaintiff: Kenneth Adrian Fuller
Defendant: Jeff Bigley
Case Number: 3:2012cv05044
Filed: September 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Mendocino
Presiding Judge: PSLC CET
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/25/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)
March 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Of Dismissal With Leave to Amend by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuller v. Bigley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Adrian Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Bigley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?