Tall et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc (MERS) et al
Brian Tall and Joanne Olivas |
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc (MERS), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, American Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-5 and American Home Mortgage Corporation |
3:2012cv05348 |
October 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Orange |
William Alsup |
Real Property: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013) |
Filing 29 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND VACATING HEARING by Judge William Alsup [granting 20 Motion to Dismiss]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2012) |
Filing 26 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 25 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012) |
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Hon. William Alsup denying 8 Motion for TRO.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING HEARING RE PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TRO re 8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Brian Tall, Joanne Olivas (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.