Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Action Electronics Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: Technology Properties Limited, LLC
Defendant: Action Electronics Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 3:2012mc80094
Filed: March 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Granting Complainant Technology Properties Ltd.s Motion for the Court to Issue a Commission to Take Depositions of Koji Dei. Signed by Judge Charles Breyer on 4/3/12. (tdmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Action Electronics Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Technology Properties Limited, LLC
Represented By: Thomas T. Carmack
Represented By: James Carl Otteson
Represented By: Irvin E. Tyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Action Electronics Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?