California Pacific Regional Medical Center v. Global Excel Management, Inc
California Pacific Regional Medical Center |
Global Excel Management, Inc |
3:2013cv00540 |
February 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Los Angeles |
Nathanael M. Cousins |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 14-4236 MEJ, Regents of the University of California v. Global Excel Management, Inc. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/22/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2014) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 5 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013) |
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 16 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/12/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Case management statement due 6/5/2013. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/30/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2013) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Appear by Telephone 12 at Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact the Courtroom Deputy at 415.522.2039 to provide a telephone number for this appearance. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/22/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.