Rieger v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al
| Scott Ivan Rieger |
| Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc, Wells Fargo Bank National Association and Cal-Western Reconveyance Coporation |
| 3:2013cv00749 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 41 Request to appaear by telephone filed by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc, and Wells Fargo Bank National Association. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/9/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Request to Participate in Motion to Dismiss by Telephone filed by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc, Wells Fargo Bank National Association. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/16/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Request to Participate in Motion to Dismiss by Telephone filed by Cal-Western Reconveyance Coporation. Counsel shall contact Court Call at 1-888-882-6878 to make the arrangements to appear by telephone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/15/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
