Sugiharto v. Synarc, Inc et al
| Carolina Sugiharto |
| Synarc, Inc and Aaron Timm |
| 3:2013cv00921 |
| February 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND RELATED STIPULATION PER FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii); ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 30, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 30, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
31
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 2/7/2014. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 20, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
JOINT STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 7, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS The deadline to hold the mediation is October 1, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 31, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
