Bernstein v. Target Stores, Inc. et al
| John Leonard Bernstein, IV |
| Target Stores, Inc., John Doe 1-50, Mary Roe 1-50, XYZ Corp 1-50, ABC LLC 1-50 and The Names of John Doe 1-50 Mary Roe 1-50, XYZ Corp, 1-50 and ABC LLC, 1-50 |
| 3:2013cv01018 |
| March 6, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PER PARTIES' SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 11/15/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 11/4/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins denying 41 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 42 Motion to Reopen Case (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/6/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER TO REFILE MOTION. Plaintiff must refile his motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice the motion for hearing. The deadlines for response and reply in connection with docket entry 26 are vacated. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/23/2013. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
