Haislip v. Convergent Outsourcing , Inc.

Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing , Inc.
Plaintiff: Joshua Haislip
Case Number: 3:2013cv01324
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Thelton E. Henderson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 20, 2013 12 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/19/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)
June 4, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/04/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haislip v. Convergent Outsourcing , Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing , Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Haislip
Represented By: Jim Gerhart Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.