Whitmore v. Does 1-25, inclusive
| Marlon Whitmore |
| Does 1-25, inclusive |
| 3:2013cv01408 |
| March 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sonoma |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/10/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2015)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 87 Defendants' request to be excused from personally appearing at the settlement conference by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2015)
|
|
Filing
82
NOTICE of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Settlement Conference set for 1/9/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2014)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 58 Motion for Summary Judgment (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2014)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER setting hearing. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/29/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER re cross-motion filed by defendants Blount and Horsman and plaintiff's motion to strike. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 8/26/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER to show cause re cross-motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 8/21/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Protective Order filed by Charles Blount, Joseph Horsman. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/28/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2014)
|
|
Filing
27
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER re 26 Case Management Conference - Initial. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/30/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/11/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/18/2013 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/12/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/5/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitmore v. Does 1-25, inclusive | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marlon Whitmore | |
| Represented By: | John L. Burris |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
