Miller v. Olesiuk et al
| Robert Michael Miller |
| Shayna Olesiuk, Kathy Kalser, Diane Ellis, Barbara Pfaffenberger, Joy Crosser, Lisa Lander, Laurel Rest, Mary Laverty, Andrea Woolford-Eley, Barbara Ryan, Arleas Upton-Kea, Patrick McKenna, Arthur Murton, Richard Brown and Martin Gruenberg |
| 3:2013cv01856 |
| April 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 12 Motion to Dismiss.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
24
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 12 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
22
MODIFIED STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 Stipulation to Vacate or Continue CMC Pending Adjudication of Defendant's Motion to Dismsis, filed by Martin Gruenberg. Case Management Statement due by 9/10/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/17/2013 03:00 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 7/15/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
