Hilton v. Apple Inc Featured Case
Plaintiff: Debra Hilton
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv02167
Filed: May 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2013 Case electronically transferred to the Central District of California; new case no. 2:13-cv-07674 (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Transferring Action to Central District of California (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)
October 15, 2013 Filing 26 CLERKS NOTICE resetting CMC from 10/17/13 to 11/21/13 at 9:00 a.m. Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2013. Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. THIS IS A TEXT ONLY DOCKET ENTRY; THERE IS NO DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS NOTICE.(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)
October 10, 2013 Filing 25 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT And Response To Order To Show Cause 21 filed by Apple Inc. (Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 10/10/2013)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part 7 Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings; and Denying as Moot (1) Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss; and (2) Defendant's 11 Motion to Compel Arbitration. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
September 5, 2013 Filing 23 REPLY (re 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Claims MOTION to Stay ) / Defendant Apple Inc's Reply In Support Of Motion To Compel Arbitration Of Claims And To Stay filed byApple Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Matthew D. Powers, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F)(Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 9/5/2013)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d (2) filed byApple Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 9/5/2013)
September 5, 2013 Filing 21 CLERKS NOTICE VACATING 9/19/13 MOTIONS HEARING (Dockets 11, 14 and 6) AND RESETTING CMC TO 10/17/13 at 9:00 a.m. COURT TO ISSUE ORDER ON PAPERS. Case Management Statement due by 10/10/2013. Case Management Conference set for 10/17/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. THIS IS A TEXT ONLY DOCKET ENTRY; THERE IS NO DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS NOTICE.(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2013)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)
August 29, 2013 Filing 19 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Apple Inc Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process filed by Apple Inc. (Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
August 29, 2013 Filing 18 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel (Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
August 28, 2013 Filing 17 RESPONSE (re 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Claims MOTION to Stay ) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion To Compel Arbitration of Claims And To Stay filed byDebra Hilton. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Roy A, Katriel, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Roy A. Katriel)(Katriel, Roy) (Filed on 8/28/2013)
August 15, 2013 Filing 16 REPLY (re 7 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative MOTION to Stay Proceedings in Favor of First-Filed Action ) filed byApple Inc. (Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 8/15/2013)
August 15, 2013 Filing 15 REPLY (re 6 MOTION to Dismiss And/Or MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint ) filed byApple Inc. (Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 8/15/2013)
July 29, 2013 Filing 14 RESPONSE (re 7 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative MOTION to Stay Proceedings in Favor of First-Filed Action ) PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF FIRST-FILED ACTION filed byDebra Hilton. (Katriel, Roy) (Filed on 7/29/2013)
July 26, 2013 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Claims MOTION to Stay . Responses due by 8/28/2013. Replies due by 9/5/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/26/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)
July 26, 2013 Set/Reset Deadlines as to 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Claims MOTION to Stay . Responses due by 8/28/2013. Replies due by 9/5/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/26/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)
July 25, 2013 Filing 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Enlarge Time To File Opposition And Reply filed by Apple Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Of Matthew D. Powers)(Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 7/25/2013)
July 25, 2013 Filing 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Claims, MOTION to Stay filed by Apple Inc. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 8/8/2013. Replies due by 8/15/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Matthew D. Powers in Support, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Powers Declaration, # 3 Declaration of Janet Engler in Support, # 4 Exhibit 1 to Engler Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 2 to Engler Declaration, # 6 Declaration of Beth Headley in Support, # 7 Exhibit 1 to Headley Declaration, # 8 Declaration Declaration of Chenell Cummings in Support, # 9 Exhibit 1 to Cummings Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 2 to Cummings Declaration, # 11 Proposed Order)(Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 7/25/2013)
July 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES filed by Debra Hilton, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES, 7 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative MOTION to Stay Proceedings in Favor of First-Filed Action, 6 MOTION to Dismiss And/Or MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint . Case Management Statement due by 9/12/2013. Case Management Conference set for 9/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Responses due by 7/29/2013. Replies due by 8/15/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/16/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
July 15, 2013 Filing 9 Declaration of Roy A. Katriel in Support of 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES filed byDebra Hilton. (Related document(s) 8 ) (Katriel, Roy) (Filed on 7/15/2013)
July 15, 2013 Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES filed by Debra Hilton. (Katriel, Roy) (Filed on 7/15/2013)
July 8, 2013 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, MOTION to Stay Proceedings in Favor of First-Filed Action filed by Apple Inc. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 7/22/2013. Replies due by 7/29/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Matthew D. Powers in Support, # 2 Exhibit A to Powers Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B to Powers Declaration, # 4 Exhibit C to Powers Declaration, # 5 Exhibit D to Powers Declaration, # 6 Exhibit E to Powers Declaration, # 7 Exhibit F to Powers Declaration, # 8 Proposed Order, # 9 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 7/8/2013)
July 8, 2013 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss And/Or, MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint filed by Apple Inc. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 7/22/2013. Replies due by 7/29/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 7/8/2013)
May 30, 2013 Filing 5 NOTICE by Apple Inc of Pending Case in Another District per N.D. Cal. Local Rule 3-13 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proof of Service)(Weatherford, Victoria) (Filed on 5/30/2013)
May 30, 2013 Filing 4 STIPULATION re 1 Complaint Under L.R. 6-1(a) Extending Defendant's Time to Respond filed by Apple Inc. (Powers, Matthew) (Filed on 5/30/2013)
May 10, 2013 Filing 3 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 8/1/2013. Case Management Conference set for 8/8/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
May 10, 2013 Filing 2 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Debra Hilton.. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)
May 10, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple Inc (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 34611085977.). Filed by Debra Hilton. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilton v. Apple Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra Hilton
Represented By: Roy A. Katriel
Represented By: Roy Arie Katriel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew David Powers
Represented By: Victoria Leigh Weatherford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?