Reimer v. Corporacion de Viajes Mundiales S.A. et al
Gregory Reimer |
Costa Rican Internet Services LLC and Corporacion de Viajes Mundiales S.A. |
3:2014cv00147 |
January 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2014) |
Filing 34 ORDER approving substitution of attorney signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2014) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 Continuing the Filing Deadlines re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative, on the Basis of Forum Non Conveniens. Responses due by 5/1/2014. Replies due by 5/8/2014. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 2/25/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 Stipulation to reset 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative, on the Basis of Forum Non Conveniens. Motion Hearing set for 5/27/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 2/21/2014. (knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.