Frenzel v. Aliphcom
Robert Frenzel |
Aliphcom |
3:2014cv03587 |
August 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
William H. Orrick |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/06/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2016) |
Filing 45 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/13/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016) |
Filing 40 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Statement due by 1/6/2016. Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/23/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015) |
Filing 37 ORDER approving 36 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/04/2015. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2015) |
Filing 34 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 26 MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Hon. William H. Orrick. Frenzel shall file a second amended complaint, if any, by July 27, 2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2015) |
Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT ALIPHCOM DBA JAWBONE'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Responses due by 5/27/2015. Replies due by 4/24/2015. Motion Hearing continued to 5/8/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/13/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2015) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. Frenzel shall file an amended complaint, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2014) |
Filing 17 ORDER re 16 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing and Modify Briefing Schedule. Response due by 11/10/2014. Reply due by 11/25/2014. Motion Hearing set for 12/17/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/30/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2014) |
Filing 9 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/2/14. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Frenzel v. Aliphcom | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Frenzel | |
Represented By: | Lawrence Timothy Fisher |
Represented By: | Julia A. Luster |
Represented By: | Annick Marie Persinger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Aliphcom | |
Represented By: | Mortimer H. Hartwell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.