City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System v. Prudential Financial Inc.
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System
Defendant: Prudential Financial Inc., National Shopmen Pension Fund, Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension & Annuity Funds and Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund
Movant: California Department of Insurance
Case Number: 3:2014mc80161
Filed: June 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH by Hon. William Alsup granting 1 Motion to Quash. The Clerk shall close the file.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2014)
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE RE UPCOMING HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/18/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO QUASH re 1 MOTION to Quash filed by California Department of Insurance, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 1 MOTION to Quash : Motion Hearing set for 6/19/2014 08:00 AM before Hon. William Alsup. The opposition is due by June 13, and the reply is due by June 16. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/4/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System v. Prudential Financial Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prudential Financial Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Shopmen Pension Fund
Represented By: Shawn A. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension & Annuity Funds
Represented By: Shawn A. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund
Represented By: Shawn A. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: California Department of Insurance
Represented By: David Lew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?