Moralez v. Rowen et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 8, 2015
ORDER: Re 13 Case Management Statement filed by Francisca Moralez. A Joint Updated Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2016. Case Management Conference reset to 3/10/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/8/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2015)
|November 17, 2015
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This is an ADA case that is subject to the case-management deadlines set forth in this districts General Order 56. The plaintiff filed a complaint on June 3, 2015. (ECF No. 1.)No defendant has appeared; the plaintiff did dismi ss the Calhoun Family Trust. (ECF No. 8.) Nothing on the docket suggests any activity that is required by General Order 56 (such as a joint site inspection or a Notice of Need for Mediation). (See General Order 56 3, 6.) Under the circumstances, the court orders the plaintiff to show cause in writing by November 23, 2015 why this action should not dismissed without prejudice for her failure to prosecute it. The response must include any request for a change in the scheduling order at ECF No. 3 and include the plaintiffs plan for proceeding in the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/17/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)
|July 31, 2015
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT, CALHOUN FAMILY TRUST ONLY, WITH PREJUDICE: Re 8 Notice (Other) filed by Francisca Moralez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/31/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?