Aston et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 20, 2016
ORDER GRANTING 48 STIPULATION to Continue: Deadline re Class Certification Discovery, Further Case Management Conference, and Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2016 . Further Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Class Certification Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/20/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016) Modified on 7/20/2016 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).
|March 28, 2016
ORDER GRANTING 37 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing and Related Deadlines for Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/28/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)
|September 15, 2015
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/15/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015)
|June 15, 2015
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Case Management Statement due by 9/4/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/15/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?