City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. et al
| City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System |
| Revance Therapeutics, Inc., L. Daniel Browne, Lauren P. Silvernail, Jacob Waugh, Robert Byrnes, Ronald W. Eastman, Phyllis Gardner, James Glasheen, Jonathan Tunnicliffe, Ronald Wooten, Cowen and Company, LLC, Piper Jaffray & Co., BMO Capital Markets Corp. and William Blair & Company, L.L.C. |
| 3:2015cv02512 |
| June 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 8 MOTION TO REMAND. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2015)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2015)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 11 Stipulation re 8 MOTION to Remand Extending Time to Oppose Motion to Remand. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
