Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund et al v. Edward R. Bacon Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund, James H. Beno, Trustee, Stephen J. Mack, Trustee, Don Crosatto, Trustee, Douglas Cornford, Trustee, John Di Bernardo, Trustee, Jose Santana, Trustee, James Schwantz, Trustee and Scott Pagter, Trustee
Defendant:
Edward R. Bacon Company, Inc.
Case Number:
3:2015cv02685
Filed:
June 16, 2015
Court:
California Northern District Court
Office:
San Francisco Office
County:
Alameda
Presiding Judge:
Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit:
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:
29:1132
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| August 2, 2016 | 37 |
STIPULATION AND ORDER VOLUNTARILY DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/2/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)
|
| July 21, 2016 | 35 |
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT granting 34 Motion to Continue. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 9/8/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Update or stipulated dismissal due by 8/28/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/21/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
