Edward Rotstein, et al v. Terrafusion, Inc. et al
Terrafusion International, Inc. and Edward Rotstein |
Terrafusion, Inc. and MCC Partners NY LLC |
3:2015cv02993 |
June 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Richard Seeborg |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND INSTRUCTING PLAINTIFFS TO PROCEED BY WAY OF DEFAULT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/14/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2017) |
Filing 56 ORDER STRIKING ANSWER FILED BY MARK CUKIER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/9/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2017) |
Filing 55 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/3/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 41 Request to shorten time and denying request for immediate withdrawal as counsel.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016) |
Filing 29 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 26 Administrative Motion. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2016) |
Filing 25 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/3/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/24/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.