Federal Insurance Company et al v. McDouglass Group, Inc.
Federal Insurance Company and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America |
McDouglass Group, Inc, Tyler Douglass and Andy McCullough |
3:2015cv03123 |
July 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Kandis A. Westmore |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal filed by McDouglass Group, Inc, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Andy McCullough, Federal Insurance Company, Tyler Douglass, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/20/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016) |
Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting Defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss the third, fourth, and sixth causes of action with leave to amend. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within 14 days of this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Federal Insurance Company and McDouglass Group, Inc. filed by McDouglass Group, Inc, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Andy McCullough, Federal Insurance Company, Tyler Douglass, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/30/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.