Second Measure, Inc. v. Steven Kim

Plaintiff: Second Measure, Inc.
Defendant: Steven Kim
Case Number: 3:2015cv03395
Filed: July 23, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 3, 2017 74 Opinion or Order of the Court CONDITIONAL SIXTY (60) DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/3/17. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)
November 10, 2015 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Second Measure, Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on November 10, 2015. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Second Measure, Inc. v. Steven Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Second Measure, Inc.
Represented By: Harmeet K. Dhillon
Represented By: Nitoj P. Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Kim
Represented By: Sam N. Dawood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?