Markette v. XOMA Corp et al
| Joseph F. Markette |
| John W. Varian, Paul D. Rubin and XOMA Corporation |
| 3:2015cv03425 |
| July 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 114 Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 94 MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Amended Pleadings due by 10/26/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Directing Supplemental Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 96 Stipulation Continuing Hearing on Defendants' 94 Motion to Dismiss Amended Class Action Complaint to December 15, 2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2016)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 84 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Sherief Morsy. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 81 Motion to Appear by Telephone at May 24, 2016 Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2016)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 78 Motion to Appear by Telephone at the May 24, 2016 Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL; SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (granting 11 ; denying 12 , 17 and 22 )(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2016)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER OF RECUSAL Re 3:15-cv-05236-HSG AND ORDER RESCINDING RELATED CASE. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/13/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER OF RECUSAL RE CASE NO. 15-cv-5429-HSG AND ORDER RESCINDING RELATED CASE ORDER RE CASE NOS. 15-cv-3425-HSG and 15-cv-5236-HSG. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/24/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 69 Stipulation 66 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)
|
|
Filing
66
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 15-5236. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 01/12/2015. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 55 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2015)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 32 Motion for Pro Hac Vice For Megan M. Sullivan. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 9 Stipulation to Vacate Initial Case Management Conference and Reset All Related Deadlines and Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond the Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
