Jacinto v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Alberto Jacinto
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv03516
Filed: July 30, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 8, 2016 24 Opinion or Order of the Court Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 23 Stipulation awarding Equal Access to Justice Act Attorney Fees and Expenses.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2016)
April 25, 2016 21 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT, ORDER re 20 STIPULATION to Remand filed by Carolyn W. Colvin ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 04/25/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacinto v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alberto Jacinto
Represented By: Geri Nadine Kahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?