Quinby et al v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
| Jaimie Quinby, Linda Gomes and Eric Fontes |
| Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv04099 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| William H. Orrick |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE AWARDS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/18/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2017)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER REVISING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING AND HEARING DATES TO PERMIT MEDIATION granting 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/09/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 STIPULATION to Reschedule Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference continued to 1/19/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 1/12/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/19/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
