Momoh v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
Ramat B Momoh |
Wells Fargo Bank NA |
3:2015cv04729 |
October 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 49 Stipulation to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2017) |
Filing 48 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL RE 46 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/26/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2016) |
Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Stipulation Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016) |
Filing 40 SCHEDULING ORDER Amended Pleadings due by 9/30/2016; Discovery due by 12/19/2016; Motion Hearing set for 3/16/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/20/2017 03:00 PM; Jury Selection /Jury Trial (5-day) set for 7/5/2017 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/21/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016) |
Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 35 Motion to Appear by Telephone at the Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2016) |
Filing 34 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Motion to Appear by Telephone at Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2016) |
Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING DEFENDANT'S 15 MOTION TO DISMISS; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016) |
Filing 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/1/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/29/2016. (hsglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2016) |
Filing 19 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Stipulation to Extend to Respond to 15 Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 13 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015) |
Filing 11 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee(ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Momoh v. Wells Fargo Bank NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ramat B Momoh | |
Represented By: | Stuart Michael Price |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA | |
Represented By: | Courtney C Wenrick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.