Lifshitz v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff: Ehud Lifshitz
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2016cv00930
Filed: February 24, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 26, 2016 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 19 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ehud Lifshitz. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/26/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lifshitz v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ehud Lifshitz
Represented By: Daniel Parker Jett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Marlene S. Muraco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?