United States of America v. Lui
| United States of America |
| Lawrence Y. Lui |
| 3:2016cv00969 |
| February 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CONTEMPT AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 104 Motion for Contempt; denying 109 Motion for Summary Judgment. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018)
|
|
Filing
101
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 100 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Request To Continue Case Management Conference filed by United States of America. Case Management Statement due by 10/2/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/11/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 6, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER GRANTING SUMMONSES IN PART, GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS DOCUMENT SUMMONS by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting 45 Motion to Quash; denying 59 Motion to Dismiss; granting 32 Motion to Quash. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE A SUR-REPLY re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER ORDER TO ALLOW RESPONDENT TO FILE A SUR REPLY filed by Lawrence Y. Lui. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 7, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2016)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO QUASH REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 6, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2016)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Lawrence Y. Lui. Case Management Statement due by 5/31/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 18, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/7/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 15, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Lui | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Cynthia Lewis Stier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lawrence Y. Lui | |
| Represented By: | Martin Aaron Schainbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
