Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

Plaintiff: Windy City Innovations, LLC
Defendant: Facebook Inc.
Case Number: 3:2016cv01730
Filed: April 6, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Windy City Innovations, LLC
Represented By: Philip Scott Anderson
Represented By: Christopher D. Banys
Represented By: Bradley Wayne Caldwell
Represented By: Jason D. Cassady
Represented By: Jason Dodd Cassady
Represented By: John Austin Curry
Represented By: Jennifer Lu Gilbert
Represented By: Robert B. Long, Jr.
Represented By: Warren Joseph McCarty, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Facebook Inc.
Represented By: Reuben Ho-Yen Chen
Represented By: Heidi L. Keefe
Represented By: Heidi Lyn Keefe
Represented By: Larry S McDevitt
Represented By: Phillip Edward Morton
Represented By: Mark Randolph Weinstein
Represented By: David M. Wilkerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?