Voting Rights Defense Project v. Padilla et al
| American Independent Party, Voting Rights Defense Project, Clara Daims and Suzanne Bushnell |
| Alex Padilla, John Arntz and Tim Dupuis |
| 3:2016cv02739 |
| May 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William Alsup |
| Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/26/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Hon. William Alsup re 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
18
SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Response date, if any, is set by the court despite the default phrase of "due by 5/31/16"in this docket text;. Responses due by 5/31/2016. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/27/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
10
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 9 Clerk's Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/18/16. (dl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
