Shahani v. Moctezuma

Plaintiff: Ray Khem Shahani
Defendant: Nieves Moctezuma
Case Number: 3:2016cv03862
Filed: July 8, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 20, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corleu on 1/20/2017. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2017)
December 5, 2016 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Show Cause Response due by 12/12/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/5/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shahani v. Moctezuma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray Khem Shahani
Represented By: Ray K. Shahani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nieves Moctezuma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?