Richard Farley v. Ronald Davis
Richard W. Farley |
Ron Davis |
Habeas Capital Notification |
3:2016cv04443 |
August 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Santa Clara |
DPLC ALL |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 61 Motion to Stay. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2018) |
Filing 58 ORDER REJECTING PROPOSED LITIGATION SCHEDULE re 57 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Richard W. Farley, Ron Davis. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/15/18. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2018) |
Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 41 Stipulation; granting in part 47 Motion to Dismiss; granting 52 Motion for Clarification. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/5/18. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2018) |
Filing 51 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL AND GRANTING REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF RECORDS by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 38 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2018) |
Filing 23 ORDER Denying Pro Se Motion. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/10/2017. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2017) |
Filing 20 Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 15 Equitable Tolling.(pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.