Dastime Group Limited et al v. Vartanyan
| Konstantin Grigorishin and Dastime Group Limited |
| Alexander Vartanyan |
| 3:2016cv05274 |
| September 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Outside US |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying 5 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Petitioners shall file the documents at issue in the public record no earlier than January 24, 2017 and no later than February 3, 2017. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)
|
|
Filing
24
Amended Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying 21 Administrative Motion to Permit Filing or Shorten Time. This corrects and supersedes 23 the Court's previous Order. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
23
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying 21 Administrative Motion to Permit Filing or Shorten Time. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2017)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER regarding 5 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Responsive declarations are due no later than January 13, 2017. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 16, 2016. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
