Nagy v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
| Dave Nagy |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Group Long Term Disability Plan For Employees of Oracle America, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv05309 |
| September 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/11/18. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2018)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Stipulation ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR FILING OPPOSITIONS ON CROSS MOTIONs. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 23 Stipulation Extending Deadlines on Cross Motions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2017)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 20 Motion to Appear by Telephone at January 3, 2017 Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 16 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
