Access Capital Investments Fund Two, LP v. Ramos et al
| Access Capital Investments Fund Two, LP |
| Ramos, Jose Ramos and Eufrocinia Ramos |
| 3:2016cv06434 |
| November 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Elizabeth D Laporte |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Receipt/Acknowledgment of certified copy of docket entries and Certified Copy of remand order from San Mateo County Superior Court. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE: Certified copy of docket entries and certified copies of remand order mailed to San Mateo County Superior Court. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2016) |
Filing 9
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 22, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2016: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 8 DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge; by Eufrocinia Ramos, Jose Ramos. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2016) |
| Filing 7 Opposition to #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Remand, filed by Jose Ramos, Eufrocinia Ramos filed byEufrocinia Ramos, Jose Ramos. (Related document(s) #5 ) (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2016) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/7/16. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2016)
|
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Remand; Order Reassigning Case by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Objections due by 11/21/2016. (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2016)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Access Capital Investments Fund Two, LP.. (Rothbard, Todd) (Filed on 11/7/2016) |
|
Filing 3
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/31/2017. Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2017 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 11/4/16. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2016)
|
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT A: re #1 Notice of Removal, filed byEufrocinia Ramos, Jose Ramos. (Related document(s) #1 ) (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2016) |
| Sent by U.S. MAIL Copies of #3 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference & ADR Deadlines to Defendant Eufrocinia Ramos and Defendant Jose Ramos at Their San Bruno, California Address.Re #3 Order (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2016) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL : (NO PROCESS); from San Mateo Superior Court. Their case number is 16UDL00064. ( Filing fee $400.00; Receipt Number 34611119641 ). Filed byEufrocinia Ramos, Jose Ramos. Consent/Declination due by 11/17/2016. (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2016: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (aaa, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2016: #2 Receipt) (aaa, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
