NexRep, LLC v. ALIPHCOM

Plaintiff: NexRep, LLC
Defendant: ALIPHCOM
Case Number: 3:2016cv06647
Filed: November 16, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 7, 2017 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 16 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting 22 Report and Recommendations as Motion for Default Judgment. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2017)
February 24, 2017 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE as to the citizenship of its members. Show Cause Response due by 3/3/2017. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on February 24, 2017. (jsclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NexRep, LLC v. ALIPHCOM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NexRep, LLC
Represented By: Randolph Gaw
Represented By: Joshua Myung Ko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALIPHCOM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?