In re King.com Limited

Movant: in re King.com Limited
Case Number: 3:2016mc80070
Filed: March 24, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 16, 2016 24 Opinion or Order of the Court Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 8 Respondents' Motion to Quash. (jcslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2016)
June 21, 2016 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 15 Stipulation filed by in re King.com Limited as to 8 MOTION to Quash . Responses due by 7/1/2016. Replies due by 7/22/2016. Motion Hearing re-set for 8/5/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/21/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re King.com Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: in re King.com Limited
Represented By: Jennifer Lloyd Kelly
Represented By: Liwen Arius Mah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?