RPR Larkspur Owner, LLC v. Jones

Plaintiff: RPR Larkspur Owner, LLC
Defendant: Donald Jones
Case Number: 3:2017cv00214
Filed: January 17, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 19, 2017 13 Opinion or Order of the Court SUA SPONTE ORDER RE CASE RELATION TO 17-CV-00214 RS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IFP APPLICATION AND REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MARIN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on April 19, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RPR Larkspur Owner, LLC v. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RPR Larkspur Owner, LLC
Represented By: Todd Bennett Rothbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?