District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Floor Seal Technology, Inc.
| District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Chris Christophersen, John Maggiore, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Marian Bourboulis, Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund, and its Board of Trustees, John Sherak, Central Coast Counties Floor Covering Industry Pension Fund, and its Board of Trustees and District Council No. 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades |
| Floor Seal Technology, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv00226 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
AMENDED JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/1/2022. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2022)
|
|
Filing
16
WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $265,402.14 (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2018)
|
|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/9/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
