Harris et al v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
| Starvonna Harris and Jonathan Strickland |
| Best Buy Stores, L.P. |
| 3:2017cv00446 |
| January 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 177 Stipulated for Dismissal. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2019)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING PLAINTIFF HARRISS UNOPPOSED 174 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 157 Stipulation to Move Trial and Pretrial Conference Dates. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFFS 141 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS 143 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2019)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 85 MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, GRANTING DEFENDANTS 118 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS AND REQUEST TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS ( 94 , 95 ) MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM ORDERS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE.Case Management Statement due by 9/4/2018 and Further Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2018 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2018)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 124 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 91 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF JONATHAN STRICKLAND'S CLAIMS AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 58 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF STARVONA HARRIS'S PAGA CAUSE OF ACTION BASED ON OVERTIME WAGES.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2018)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 67 MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO PRODUCE AN EXPERT REPORT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding parties' 80 Joint Discovery Letter Brief re: Harris's First Set of Document Requests. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 75 Stipulation Relating to Class Certification Motion. Motions due by 10/26/2017; Responses due by 11/16/2017; Replies due by 11/30/2017; Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2017)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 60 , 61 Joint Discovery Letter Briefs re: Strickland. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2017)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 62 7/28/17 Discovery Letter Brief re: Plaintiff Starvona Harris's Deposition. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 46 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINTPlaintiff is required to E-FILE the amended document. Amended Pleadings due by 7/14/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2017)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 34 Motion for Protective Order. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
