Mitzie Perez et al v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al
| Mitzie Perez and California League of United Latin American Citizens |
| Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo, N.A. |
| 3:2017cv00454 |
| January 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
366
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 8, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2021)
|
|
Filing
266
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS OF FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS. Plaintiffs are directed to file their Fifth Amended Complaint in the public record and to do so no later than July 19, 2019. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 12, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019)
|
|
Filing
228
ORDER GRANTING DEFERRED PORTION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF. Wells Fargo need not provide discovery as to its mortgage loan and automobile loan practices. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 15, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND DEFERRING RULING IN PART ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RELIEF; STAYING CLASS DISCOVERY IN PART. To the extent the Motion for Relief challenges the order allowing class discovery on personal loans, the motion is denie d. To the extent the Motion for Relief challenges the order allowing class discovery on automobile loans and mortgages, the Court defers ruling thereon until after plaintiffs have filed any Fourth Amended Complaint and the Court has resolved any moti on to strike the class allegations included therein. Class discovery on automobile loans and mortgages remains stayed pending resolution of the deferred portion of the Motion for Relief. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 9, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2018)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND; DEFERRING RULING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY ORDERS; GRANTING MOTION TO STAY RELATED DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION FOR RELIEF; VACATING HEARING . Plaintiffs' class allegations are stricken, and plaintiffs are afforded leave to amend for purposes of redefining the proposed class. Any Third Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than February 16, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 30, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 3, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2017)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/15/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2017)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Miazad, Ossai. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
