Al-Mowafak et al v. Trump et al
Foreign students, the ACLU of Northern California and the Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay challenged President Trump's Executive Order entitled Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States alleging that it violated the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.
| Hadil Al-Mowafak, Wasim Ghaleb, ACLU of Northern California, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay and John Doe |
| Donald Trump, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rex W Tillerson, John Kelly, Kevin McAleenan and Carrie Azurin |
| 3:2017cv00557 |
| February 2, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William H. Orrick |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Certificate of Interested Entities by ACLU of Northern California, Hadil Al-Mowafak, John Doe, Wasim Ghaleb, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay [Plaintiffs' Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement and Civil Local Rule 3-15 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons] (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 23 Summons Issued as to Carrie Azurin. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 22 Summons Issued as to Kevin McAleenan. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 21 Summons Issued as to John Kelly. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 20 Summons Issued as to Rex W Tillerson. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 19 Summons Issued as to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 18 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of State. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 16 ERRONEOUSLY POSTED: PLEASE DISREGARD Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of State. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) Modified on 2/3/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Donald Trump. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 14 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2017. Case Management Conference set for 5/9/2017 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 2/3/17. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 13 Case assigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Electronic filing error. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: 1 Complaint, filed by Wasim Ghaleb, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay, Hadil Al-Mowafak, ACLU of Northern California Defendant Parties Entered Incorrectly (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017) |
| Filing 12 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Proceed Anonymously filed by ACLU of Northern California, Hadil Al-Mowafak, JOHN DOE, Wasim Ghaleb, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay. Responses due by 2/6/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of John Doe, # 2 Proposed Order)(Rapaport, Jay) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Rapaport (Rapaport, Jay) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 10 DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge; by ACLU of Northern California, Hadil Al-Mowafak, JOHN DOE, Wasim Ghaleb, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) Modified on 2/3/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-11127128.). Filed byJOHN DOE, Wasim Ghaleb, ACLU of Northern California, Hadil Al-Mowafak, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lauridsen, Robert) (Filed on 2/2/2017) Modified on 2/3/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
