ARRIS Solutions, Inc. et al v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al
ARRIS Solutions, Inc. and ARRIS Enterprises LLC |
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation of America, Sony Mobile Communications (USA), Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc. |
3:2017cv01098 |
March 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Edward J. Davila |
Susan van Keulen |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER granting 48 Motion to Stay. This action is STAYED in its entirety until the conclusion of the ITC investigation. All other pending deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED, and any pending motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall administratively close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/10/2017. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017) |
Filing 68 ORDER ON 65 JOINT LETTER BRIEF RE PLAINTIFF'S INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen on 9/12/2017. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2017) |
Filing 67 ORDER GRANTING 66 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED CLAIM TERMS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/11/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2017) |
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING 60 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/24/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.