Esonwune v. Regents University of California
| Peace Esonwune |
| Regents University of California and Sam Hawgood |
| 3:2017cv01102 |
| March 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 05/10/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 46 Motion to Dismiss; denying 48 Motion to Stay; denying 51 Motion to Stay; denying 54 Motion to Disqualify Judge. In the attached order, the court grants the Regents' motion to dismiss. The court dismisses the complaint against the Regents with prejudice and without leave to amend. The court dismisses all claims against Chancellor Hawgood under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) without prejudice and with leave to amend. The plaintiff must file any amended complaint by October 10, 2017. The court denies the plaintiff's motions to stay and motion to disqualify the undersigned. (lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 33 Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiff fails to state claims, and the court dismisses her complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend. She must file any amended complaint within 28 days from the date of this order. (lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
