Martin
| George Martin |
| 3:2017cv01690 |
| March 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Monterey |
| Laurel Beeler |
| PSLC CET |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; ADDRESSING OTHER REQUESTS by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Denying 175 Motion for Reconsideration re 175 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by George Martin, 173 Request filed by George Martin, [ 174] Request filed by George Martin. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL OPPOSITION re 168 Request filed by George Martin. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/30/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
170
JUDGMENT Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/21/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF LAST COURT ORDER; DENYING REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT re 153 Request filed by George Martin, 164 Request filed by George Martin, 154 Letter filed by Georg e Martin. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/21/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND CONTEMPT CITATION by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Denying 143 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 147 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Dispositive Motion due by 3/24/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2020) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2020: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SCREENING ORDER; DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 108 Motion ; Granting 109 Ex Parte Application ; Denying 110 Motion ; Denying 112 Motion ; Denying 115 Motion. Amended Complaint due by 2/6/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George Martin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
